avalooshe:

baconsloth:

prozacmorning:

punch-a-your-buns:

alskgirl:

shaydee604:

This is what happens when white guys listen to Indian music

holy shit

whenever I’m feeling sad I just watch this video.

I was not expecting that level of choreography or that they would actually know the words.  This is awesome.

my obsession with this still burns

pshh boys

This video is good times. 

(Source: videohall, via dinosaurpirate)

beoulveramza:

boom-missed:

*enters the sniper tag*

image
"LOOKING FOR BLOODY PORN, ARENT YA!?"

*leaves the tag*

Demoblocked again

(via homosexyautomaton)

bustakay:

austinkleon:

Jean Tinguely on ‘Art’

"In 1960, the Swiss artist Jean Tinguely made the first of his self-destructive machine sculptures, Homage à New York, which battered itself to pieces in the Sculpture Garden of the Museum of Modern Art, New York.”

(via doubledamnit)

LUCKILY MY CURRENT NEIGHBORS ARE VERY QUIET

protowilson:

drtanner-sfw:

Sin!Mod: oh.
Sin!Mod: my.
Sin!Mod: god.
Sin!Mod: http://notalwaysfriendly.com/putting-the-matter-to-bed/34566
Dr Tanner: HAH
Dr Tanner: my solution to noisy sexhavers has historically been to find the unsexiest music I can and play it really, really loudly
Dr Tanner: that or micspam
Sin!Mod: LOL
Dr Tanner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdkLZNyEMVU I challenge anyone to successfully have sex while this is blaring from the floor below/a room over.
Dr Tanner: and in all likelihood it will be accompanied by my loud, obnoxious laughter because it’s shit like this that is funnier to me than anything else in the fucking world for some reason
Sin!Mod: XDD
Dr Tanner: MAGIC MISSLE

I prefer this one:

OH MY FUCKING LORDS I FORGOT ALL ABOUT IT.

(Source: drtanner)

Sin!Mod: oh.
Sin!Mod: my.
Sin!Mod: god.
Sin!Mod: http://notalwaysfriendly.com/putting-the-matter-to-bed/34566
Dr Tanner: HAH
Dr Tanner: my solution to noisy sexhavers has historically been to find the unsexiest music I can and play it really, really loudly
Dr Tanner: that or micspam
Sin!Mod: LOL
Dr Tanner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdkLZNyEMVU I challenge anyone to successfully have sex while this is blaring from the floor below/a room over.
Dr Tanner: and in all likelihood it will be accompanied by my loud, obnoxious laughter because it's shit like this that is funnier to me than anything else in the fucking world for some reason
Sin!Mod: XDD
Dr Tanner: MAGIC MISSLE
nextyearsgirl:

The absence of women in history is man made.

nextyearsgirl:

The absence of women in history is man made.

(via draayder)

comradewodka:

slimmeroo:

comradewodka:

zannibear:

if you see someone use trans* instead of trans

thats usually a bad sign

sorry, but why?

i thought it just means that you’re acknowledging that there are people who are often grouped under the “trans umbrella” but who don’t necessarily identify as “trans” per se, for any number of reasons

that’s the only way I’ve seen it used, anyway

i mean a brief google search is telling me that the basic argument against it is similar to the bisexual/pansexual debate— that people who are against it don’t want transfolk to be treated as special separate groups, and that we should be fighting to make existing terms inclusive instead of making new terms

but uh, correct me if I’m wrong, but if a nonbinary person doesn’t actually feel like the word “trans” adequately describes them and therefore asks for an inclusivity indicator such as the asterix to be used, wouldn’t… ignoring that and telling them “no you’re wrong ‘trans’ DOES include you” be identity policing/erasure?

or am i just behind in the times as far as this issue goes??

the * is a bad sign because “trans” is already an umbrella term— one that was originally coined by trans women. people looked at amab people who fell under the trans umbrella and went “yeah, like that, but MORE INCLUSIVE” and completely missed the point. it’s another form of subtle transmisogyny where trans women have made something and their work is ignored.

that’s my half-remembered understanding of it?? i’ll do some more research and see if i can find a better explanation by someone else

I did some reading from the post I reblogged from polly and I think I get it a little better now?

basically: “trans*” probably started as an attempt the bridge the initial transsexual/transgender debate and eventually arose with the intent that it become an umbrella term that also included nb people, but then it got co-opted by a bunch of people who didn’t actually know what the higgityheckie they were talking about and became “”“inclusive”“” to the point of meaninglessness/erasure (especially towards transwomen of color)

and is just generally another not-as-inclusive-as-they-think-it-is thing that is spearheaded by loud white afabs and uninformed cis allies to the exclusion of everyone else

yes?

though I have some friends telling me it’s bad because it implies nbs aren’t trans enough to be trans…

and then other sources saying that the attempt to include nbs/other identities that arguably aren’t “trans” at all is actually what erases everyone to their detriment? and that the nb experience isnt necessarily the trans experience but that they can share some other term like GIM/GSM instead?

which… seem to contradict each other……………….

(avril lavigne whisper) why do things gotta be so complicated……..

AND ONCE AGAIN I AM A WISER PERSON TODAY THAN I WAS YESTERDAY.

some boy: stop generalizing all men
some boy: as a guy, i have to say, this is just how guys are, this is what the bros are like, im just saying whats on every guys mind, if your man says differently he's lying, real men don't ____, im a piece of shit

Knife-wielding student wounds 22 in Pennsylvania school

rareandradiantmaiden:

sourcedumal:

the-screeching-goat:

baritonepats:

owning-my-truth:

I live a 30 minute drive from here and this is an utter and complete tragedy. My heart goes out to all of the victims and their families and I am hoping that they all recover fully from this terrifying act.

I am wondering, though, about the elephant in the room: white male violence.

With each tragedy and incident of mass violence perpetrated at the hands of white men, these discussions come up, although white progressives usually subsume them under discussions about gun control (which is also necessary, but let us not forget that white men also have disproportionate gun ownership in this country over other racial and gender groups). The Newton massacre was yet another reminder of this, and now again, today:

White boy walks into school (or other public institution), and goes on a rampage wounding or killing dozens in the process.

Why is this not surprising anymore? Well the facts:

70% of mass killings in the U.S. since 1982 have been by white men

Check out this timeline of mass shootings in the U.S. to see for yourself.

Many of us POC and black folks in particular wax long about this, but what if the statistics were reversed and 70% of mass killings in the U.S. were being committed by black men rather than white men? How would that not spark a national conversation about black male violence and also be used to pathologize black men as (even more) criminal and violent?

But at the same time, it’s so clear that the ways in which whiteness and maleness operates is by conferring invisibility on the subject. It allows us to give these boys and men the benefit of the doubt, when we would never do the same for a POC. It allows us to be willfully obtuse about the need for us to address male violence across all racial lines (due to patriarchy)  and specifically white male violence and their internalized desire to control their environments and surroundings, leading to these incidents of mass violence (due to white supremacist patriarchy). 

We would think that in a country where violence and genocide perpetrated by white men has been with us since 1492, that this wouldn’t be a conversation that we could somehow “miss.” You would think that with incident after incident of mass violence, that we would try to address the larger systems of domination (white supremacist capitalist patriarchy) which these boys and men have internalized, rather than deflecting immediately into an ableist discussion of their mental health. Addressing these systems of domination is an act of love and empathy for all people, them included, to create a society of love, compassion and mutual respect, where mass acts of violence like this are a thing of the past.

But, no, this is America. What do you expect?

Again my heart goes out to the victims and their families and I wish you all a speedy recovery in this difficult time. 

Also addressing a related issue that always goes unquestioned in the wake of these tragedies is why it is only these acts of violence in upper-middle class neighborhoods that are marked as tragedies, when dispossessed communities of color are visited daily by the violence of the state and a racist capitalist misogynist anti-queer society.

As my African American Studies professor noted, the media and these communities always say “Why us? This isn’t supposed to happen here”, with the obvious implication that such violence should only happen “there”.

can we NOT turn this into a discussion of social justice just yet?

something terrible happened. I don’t care if a white, black, hispanic, asian, or any other race did it. no need to turn this into some pretentious PSA about racism and how much murica sucks yet.

Funny how when the discussion of white pathology comes up, somebody always has to go ‘can we not turn it into a soshul juztis post?”

Nope

This NEEDS to be discussed.

As long as white people continue to mass murder at an overwhelming rate and still be given the benefit of the doubt while POC are killed by police for sneezing wrong, IT WILL BE A SOSHUL JUZTIZ ISSUE

Deal with it.

White male violence needs to be deconstructed, analyzed, broken down, everything

White male violence is the root of this issue

white boys scare the shit out of me.

(via grub-boy)

homosexyautomaton:

badhanni:

got requests for reno being fooled around with in a public place (or as i imagined, under the table of a coffee shop) and also buttlickin. please keep sending ideas to me !!! i need to get better at this bizniss, like, drastically lol

yes.good. great. i love it.

VERY GOOD

kissafish:

scificity:

Wall-mounted water cooled PC

#nerdboner

Good christs, I can only think of how wrecked by dust and fuck knows what else that thing is going to get.

kissafish:

scificity:

Wall-mounted water cooled PC

#nerdboner

Good christs, I can only think of how wrecked by dust and fuck knows what else that thing is going to get.

sourcedumal:

raptorific:

Swear to god, some guys are terrified that girls are faking common interests to impress them and act really hostile towards anyone they even SUSPECT of doing such a thing

but then they turn around and fake a whole friendship in the hopes of getting sex out of girls, and get mad at them when it doesn’t work

and they super do not see the irony in that

image

(via typette)