This is what happens when white guys listen to Indian music
whenever I’m feeling sad I just watch this video.
I was not expecting that level of choreography or that they would actually know the words. This is awesome.
my obsession with this still burns
This video is good times.
Dr Tanner: HAH
Dr Tanner: my solution to noisy sexhavers has historically been to find the unsexiest music I can and play it really, really loudly
Dr Tanner: that or micspam
Dr Tanner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdkLZNyEMVU I challenge anyone to successfully have sex while this is blaring from the floor below/a room over.
Dr Tanner: and in all likelihood it will be accompanied by my loud, obnoxious laughter because it’s shit like this that is funnier to me than anything else in the fucking world for some reason
Dr Tanner: MAGIC MISSLE
I prefer this one:
OH MY FUCKING LORDS I FORGOT ALL ABOUT IT.
|Dr Tanner:||my solution to noisy sexhavers has historically been to find the unsexiest music I can and play it really, really loudly|
|Dr Tanner:||that or micspam|
|Dr Tanner:||https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdkLZNyEMVU I challenge anyone to successfully have sex while this is blaring from the floor below/a room over.|
|Dr Tanner:||and in all likelihood it will be accompanied by my loud, obnoxious laughter because it's shit like this that is funnier to me than anything else in the fucking world for some reason|
|Dr Tanner:||MAGIC MISSLE|
if you see someone use trans* instead of trans
thats usually a bad sign
sorry, but why?
i thought it just means that you’re acknowledging that there are people who are often grouped under the “trans umbrella” but who don’t necessarily identify as “trans” per se, for any number of reasons
that’s the only way I’ve seen it used, anyway
i mean a brief google search is telling me that the basic argument against it is similar to the bisexual/pansexual debate— that people who are against it don’t want transfolk to be treated as special separate groups, and that we should be fighting to make existing terms inclusive instead of making new terms
but uh, correct me if I’m wrong, but if a nonbinary person doesn’t actually feel like the word “trans” adequately describes them and therefore asks for an inclusivity indicator such as the asterix to be used, wouldn’t… ignoring that and telling them “no you’re wrong ‘trans’ DOES include you” be identity policing/erasure?
or am i just behind in the times as far as this issue goes??
the * is a bad sign because “trans” is already an umbrella term— one that was originally coined by trans women. people looked at amab people who fell under the trans umbrella and went “yeah, like that, but MORE INCLUSIVE” and completely missed the point. it’s another form of subtle transmisogyny where trans women have made something and their work is ignored.
that’s my half-remembered understanding of it?? i’ll do some more research and see if i can find a better explanation by someone else
I did some reading from the post I reblogged from polly and I think I get it a little better now?
basically: “trans*” probably started as an attempt the bridge the initial transsexual/transgender debate and eventually arose with the intent that it become an umbrella term that also included nb people, but then it got co-opted by a bunch of people who didn’t actually know what the higgityheckie they were talking about and became “”“inclusive”“” to the point of meaninglessness/erasure (especially towards transwomen of color)
and is just generally another not-as-inclusive-as-they-think-it-is thing that is spearheaded by loud white afabs and uninformed cis allies to the exclusion of everyone else
though I have some friends telling me it’s bad because it implies nbs aren’t trans enough to be trans…
and then other sources saying that the attempt to include nbs/other identities that arguably aren’t “trans” at all is actually what erases everyone to their detriment? and that the nb experience isnt necessarily the trans experience but that they can share some other term like GIM/GSM instead?
which… seem to contradict each other……………….
(avril lavigne whisper) why do things gotta be so complicated……..
AND ONCE AGAIN I AM A WISER PERSON TODAY THAN I WAS YESTERDAY.
|some boy:||stop generalizing all men|
|some boy:||as a guy, i have to say, this is just how guys are, this is what the bros are like, im just saying whats on every guys mind, if your man says differently he's lying, real men don't ____, im a piece of shit|
got requests for reno being fooled around with in a public place (or as i imagined, under the table of a coffee shop) and also buttlickin. please keep sending ideas to me !!! i need to get better at this bizniss, like, drastically lol
yes.good. great. i love it.
Swear to god, some guys are terrified that girls are faking common interests to impress them and act really hostile towards anyone they even SUSPECT of doing such a thing
but then they turn around and fake a whole friendship in the hopes of getting sex out of girls, and get mad at them when it doesn’t work
and they super do not see the irony in that